Theory of the drone 3: Killing grounds

Excellent post on Drones together with some discussion of Joseph Pugliese’s outstanding new book.

geographical imaginations

This is the third in a series of posts on Grégoire Chamayou‘s Théorie du drone, in which I provide a detailed summary of his argument, links to some of his key sources, and reflections drawn from my soon-to-be-completed The everywhere war (and I promise to return to it as soon as I’ve finished this marathon).

5: Pattern of life analysis

Chamayou begins with the so-called ‘Terror Tuesdays‘ when President Obama regularly approves the ‘kill list’ (or disposition matrix) that authorises ‘personality strikes’ against named individuals: ‘the drones take care of the rest’.

a0018519784_2

But Chamayou immediately acknowledges that most strikes are ‘signature strikes‘ against individuals whose names are unknown but for whom a ‘pattern of life analysis‘ has supposedly detected persistent anomalies in normal rhythms of activity, which are read as signs (‘signatures’) of imminent threat.  I’ve described this as a militarized rhthmanalysis…

View original post 2,470 more words

This entry was posted in Afghanistan, Drones, Postcolonalism, Terrorism, US Foreign Policy, Warfare, Weapons. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Theory of the drone 3: Killing grounds

  1. No says:

    Great piece. Can’t wait to read the book.

Leave a comment